State ex rel. Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co. v. Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
S.Ct.Prac.R. X(5) provides that “[a]fter the time for filing an answer to the complaint or a motion to dismiss, the Supreme Court will either dismiss the case or issue an alternative or a peremptory writ, if a writ has not already been issued.”
“To obtain a writ of prohibition, a relator must show (1) that the court against whom the writ is sought is exercising or about to exercise judicial power, (2) that the exercise of power is unauthorized by law, and (3) that denying the writ will result in injury for which no other adequate remedy exists in the ordinary course of law. * * * However,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Kazmaier Supermarket, Inc. v. Toledo Edison Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1991
- State ex rel. DeBrosse v. CoolOhio Supreme Court · 1999
- Milligan v. Ohio Bell Telephone Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
- City of Akron v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1948
- State ex rel. Stern v. MascioOhio Supreme Court · 1998
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- State ex rel. Shimko v. McMonagleOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- State ex rel. Illuminating Co. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- State ex rel. Wilkinson v. ReedOhio Supreme Court · 2003
- McGuire v. Ameritech Services, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2003
- State ex rel. Columbia Gas of Ohio, Inc. v. HensonOhio Supreme Court · 2004
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.