Legal Opinion

Graham v. Myers

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 7, 1952No. Docket 98, Calendar 44,861PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBoyles, J.

In January, 1949, the plaintiff traded his 1940 Nash automobile to defendants for a 1942 Nash and assumed an obligation to pay $660 difference. After using the 1942 Nash for about 2 months, plaintiff had it returned to the discount company which had financed his purchase, and brought the instant suit against the defendants, who are used-car dealers, for damages, alleging in his declaration that they “fraudulently and falsely represented the said automobile to be free of defects and in good mechanical order.” After issue was joined, the case was tried before a jury, with verdict for plaintiff.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Candler v. HeighoMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Sullivan v. UlrichMichigan Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Groening v. OpsataMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Curby v. MastenbrookMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Fahey v. PellMichigan Supreme Court · 1945

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cormack v. American Underwriters Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. Van Tassel v. McDonald Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. Irwin v. CarltonMichigan Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Hammond v. MatthesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API