Legal Opinion

Fahey v. Pell

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 2, 1945No. Docket No. 58, Calendar No. 42,797PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStarr, C. J.

In June, 1943, plaintiffs filed bill of complaint alleging that defendant Harry Pell, an attorney at law of Allegan, and his wife, defendant Myra Pell, had “fraudulently confederated and connived to cheat and defraud” and deprive them of certain real estate in Allegan county, and asking that defendants be decreed to convey said property to them and account for damages sustained. Defendants answered, denying the charge of fraud and that .plaintiffs were entitled to the relief sought. The trial court entered decree dismissing plaintiffs’ bill, and they appeal. This being a chancery case, we…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mesh v. CitrinMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Allison v. WardMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Goldberg v. GoldbergMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Hilliker v. Jewel Oil & Gas Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1936

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Mina v. General Star Indemnity Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. Goodrich v. WallerMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Strand v. Librascope, IncorporatedDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1961
  4. Collins v. NorrisMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Franko v. OlszewskiMichigan Supreme Court · 1947

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API