Legal Opinion

Meade v. Pension Appeals & Review Committee

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided April 2, 1991No. C2-88-198PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

GEORGE C. SMITH, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court pursuant to the motion filed by the plaintiff on March 31, 1989, and the cross motion filed by the defendant on May 15, 1989, for summary judgement pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff initiated this action on January 14, 1988 in the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas, seeking relief under 29 U.S.C. Section 1132(a). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1441(a) and 28 U.S.C. Section 1446, the instant action was removed to this Court for its determination. For the reasons stated…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Alessi v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Brady v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Meade v. Pension Appeals And Review CommitteeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
  2. Meade v. Pension Appeals & Review CommitteeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API