Legal Opinion

Meade v. Pension Appeals & Review Committee

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided June 4, 1992No. 91-3415PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ENSLEN, District Judge.

This is an action for denial of disability benefits under an employee benefit plan regulated by the Employment Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. § 1001, et seq. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of defendants 760 F.Supp. 671 and plaintiff appeals. For the reasons which follow, we reverse the decision of the district court and remand for proceedings consistent with this Opinion.

I

Plaintiff-appellant, Danny Meade (Meade), filed the complaint in the Franklin County, Ohio Court of Common Pleas on January 14, 1988. Named as defendants are…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Singleton v. WulffSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Benito T. PEREZ, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
  2. Sovereign Order of Saint John of Jerusalem, Inc. v. John L. Grady, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
  3. Meade v. Pension Appeals And Review CommitteeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
  4. White v. Worthington Industries, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2010
  5. Kerry v. Southwire Co. & Affiliates Employee Benefit PlanDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2004

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API