Legal Opinion

Penaat v. Guasco

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 20, 1948No. Civ. 13588PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWard, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment given on the retrial of an action after reversal of a former judgment. (Penaat v. Terwilliger, 23 Cal.2d 865 [147 P.2d 552].) In the first trial a ruling was made that plaintiff’s title was defective in that the required publication in a newspaper of a delinquent tax list appeared in a supplement to the newspaper. (Pol. Code, §§ 3766, 3767, 3771a.) The Supreme Court reversed the ruling and held that Political Code, section 3766 as amended in 1921 merely requires publication, and that a list in the folded section of a paper circulated with news and advertising…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Simon v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  2. Tannhauser v. AdamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Emery v. Pacific Employers InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Grimm v. O'ConnellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  5. Keane v. CannovanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Costa v. BantaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  2. Peninsula Properties Co. v. County of Santa CruzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Kloehn v. PrendivilleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  4. H. S. Cramer & Co. v. Washburn-Wilson Seed Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Mayer v. SumergradeOhio Court of Appeals · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API