Legal Opinion

Kloehn v. Prendiville

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 3, 1957No. Civ. 17357PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOOD (Fred B.), J.

In this action to cancel a deed and other instruments affecting certain residential property the trial court found as follows: At all times plaintiff was the owner of the property. A confidential relation existed between plaintiff and the defendants and he reposed complete confidence in them. In 1943 he invited them to move into his home with the understanding that if they would furnish his meals and do his laundry they would have no rent, taxes, or other expenses of ownership to pay in respect to the home- and that he would draw a will devising the premises to them. About…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of CoverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Spreckels v. GorrillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Campbell v. GenshleaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  4. American National Bank v. DonnellanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Steinberger v. SteinbergerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Wyatt v. Union Mortgage Co.California Supreme Court · 1979
  2. O'NEIL v. SpillaneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  3. Faulkner v. BeattyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  4. In Re Guardianship of ChandosCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
  5. Ranes v. First National BankCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API