Adjei v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
GLICKMAN, Associate Judge:
Justice Adjei asks us to reverse a decision by the Department of Employment Services (DOES) denying his claim for workers’ compensation benefits on the ground that he and his employer were exempted from the provisions of the Dis trict of Columbia Workers’ Compensation Act by the exception to the Act’s coverage set forth in D.C.Code § 32-1503(a-3) (2001). Adjei contends that DOES misconstrued the scope of the coverage exception and misapplied it by disregarding substantial evidence in the record. We conclude otherwise and affirm the denial of Adjei’s claim.
I
Adjei…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- MCI Telecommunications Corp. v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Parreco v. District of Columbia Rental Housing CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
- Ferreira v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- Hughes v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
- Grillo v. National Bank of WashingtonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Bentt v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
- District of Columbia v. GouldDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004
- Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
- In Re Te. L.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004
- Patterson v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.