Legal Opinion
In Re Te. L.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided February 19, 2004No. 02-FS-560 to 02-FS-563, 02-FS-578, 02-FS-615 to 02-FS-617, 02-FS-630, 02-FS-674, 02-FS-745, 02-FS-746, 02-FS-760, 02-FS-761, 02-FS-773PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCHWELB, Associate Judge:
Appellants T.L. and M.L. are husband and wife. The respondents are Mrs. L.’s five children, three of whom were fathered by Mr. L.; the other two respondents are Mr. L.’s step-children. 1 Following an evi-dentiary hearing, the trial judge found that all five respondents have been neglected within the meaning of D.C.Code § 16-2301(9)(B) (2001) (hereinafter (B)), which defines a neglected child, in pertinent part, as a child who is “without proper parental care and control ... necessary for his or her physical, mental, or emotional health.” The adjudication of neglect…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Bradley v. School Bd. of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. Schooner PeggySupreme Court of the United States · 1801
- Florida Star v. B. J. F.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- In Re Ty. B.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
- Conley v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
- In re A.B.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
- Sampson v. JohnsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004
- In Re Kya. B.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.