Legal Opinion
District of Columbia v. Gould
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided June 17, 2004No. 03-CV-526PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCHWELB, Associate Judge:
This class action was brought against the District of Columbia by former officers of the Metropolitan Police Department (MPD), all of whom retired on account of disability prior to February 15, 1980, but none of whom completed twenty years of active service. The retirees allege that they, are entitled to a 5% ’’base retention differential” (BRD) pursuant to the “equalization” provision of the District of Columbia Police and Firefighters Retirement and Disability Act, 1 and, they assert, in conformity with a compensation settlement negotiated between the MPD and the…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Schweiker v. HansenSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Utah Power & Light Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Iselin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Murphy v. McCloudDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- ANTOINETTE BOLZ v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIADistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016
- Illinois Farmers Insurance Co. v. HagenbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2017
- DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA OFFICE OF TAX & REVENUE v. EXXONMOBILE OIL CORPORATIONDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016
- Jahr v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Ass'n of Indep. Sch. of Greater Wash. v. Dist. of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.