Legal Opinion
Real v. Driscoll Strawberry Associates, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 8, 1979No. 77-1935PublishedCited by 54 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRIGHT, Circuit Judge.
Fifteen individual plaintiffs (appellants), representing themselves and a class of similarly situated persons, appeal from a summary judgment dismissing their action brought under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), 29 U.S.C. §§ 201 et seq. (1976), against the appellees, Driscoll Strawberry Associates, Inc. (DSA) and Donald J. Driscoll (Driscoll). The district court concluded that the record establishes as a matter of law that the appellants do not qualify as “employees” subject to protection under the FLSA. On appeal, appellants contend that issues of material fact…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Rutherford Food Corp. v. McCombSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- United States v. SilkSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Fortner Enterprises, Inc. v. United States Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Goldberg v. Whitaker House Cooperative, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Bartels v. BirminghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- S. G. Borello & Sons, Inc. v. Department of Industrial RelationsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Michael Lauritzen and Marilyn Lauritzen, Individually and Doing Business as Lauritzen FarmsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
- Brock v. Superior Care, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
- Dynamex Operations W., Inc. v. Superior Court of L. A. Cnty.California Supreme Court · 2018
- Brock v. Superior Care, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.