Legal Opinion

People v. Brady

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 2, 2005No. A102620PublishedCited by 18 opinions

[CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

POLLAK, J.

Defendants Franklin Neal Brady and Richard Carkeek Mortensen were accused of causing the deaths of two firefighter pilots who collided when responding to a fire that broke out near defendants’ methamphetamine laboratory in a wooded area of Mendocino County. They were tried jointly on various charges, including murder, manufacturing and conspiracy to manufacture methamphetamine with special allegations that their illegal acts caused two deaths, and recklessly causing a fire that resulted in the death of the firefighters.

Mortensen was convicted only of manufacturing and…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Soule v. General Motors Corp.California Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Saelzler v. Advanced Group 400California Supreme Court · 2001
  4. People v. BlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  5. People v. SanchezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. People v. ButlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  2. Magic Kitchen LLC v. Good Things International, Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 2007
  3. People v. DawsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  4. (HC) Durham v. DavisDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
  5. (HC) Thietje v. ClarkDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API