Legal Opinion

People v. Bland

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 2002No. S097340PublishedCited by 210 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CHIN, J.

We granted review to resolve issues involving transferred intent and proximate causation.

In its classic form, the doctrine of transferred intent applies when the defendant intends to kill one person but mistakenly kills another. The intent to kill the intended target is deemed to transfer to the unintended victim so that the defendant is guilty of murder. (See generally People v. Scott (1996) 14 Cal.4th 544 [59 Cal.Rptr.2d 178, 927 P.2d 288] (Scott)) Whatever its theoretical underpinnings, this result is universally accepted. But conceptual difficulties arise when applying the…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. People v. KellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  2. People v. MayfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  3. People v. MurtishawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Keeler v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  5. United States v. Guillermo Novo Sampol, United States of America v. Alvin Ross Diaz, United States of America v. Ignacio Novo SampolCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by210 opinions

  1. People v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  2. State v. Dean (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2015
  3. People v. SouzaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
  4. People v. GonzalezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
  5. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009

205 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API