Magic Kitchen LLC v. Good Things International, Ltd.
California Court of Appeal
[CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SUZUKAWA, J.
INTRODUCTION
From the mid-1980’s until 1993, defendant and respondent The Pampered Chef, Ltd., purchased a kitchen device known as the Tartmaster from plaintiff and appellant Kitchen Connection, Inc. In about 1993, Pampered Chef learned that the patents on the Tartmaster’s design had expired, and it began sourcing copies of the Tartmaster (which it called the Cut-N-Seal) from defendants and respondents Good Things International, Ltd. and Ten Mark Corporation. Kitchen Connection discovered no later than mid-1993 that Pampered Chef was sourcing Tartmaster copies, but it waited…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Precision Instrument Manufacturing Co. v. Automotive Maintenance MacHinery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- A.C. Aukerman Company v. R.L. Chaides Construction Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
- GoTo.Com, Inc. v. Walt Disney Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Badie v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Bonfigli v. StrachanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- San Francisco Opera Ass'n v. FlickingerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Mercury Ins. Co. v. Lara, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Pacific Hills Homeowners Association v. PrunCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District v. General Reinsurance Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2015
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.