Legal Opinion

(HC) Durham v. Davis

District Court, E.D. California

Decided December 23, 2020No. 1:20-cv-01295Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 TOBIEN P. DURHAM, No. 1:20-cv-01295-AWI-SKO (HC) 12 Petitioner, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION TO DENY PETITION FOR WRIT OF 13 v. HABEAS CORPUS 14 RON BROOMFIELD, Acting Warden,1 [TWENTY-ONE DAY OBJECTION DEADLINE] 15 Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a petition for 18 writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The habeas petition presents several claims 19 challenging the conviction. As discussed below, the Court finds the claims to be…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Miller-El v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  2. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  4. Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  5. Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API