Legal Opinion

Short v. State

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided October 4, 2000No. 25787PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

SCHWARTZMAN, Judge.

Keith Manning Short appeals from the denial of his Uniform Post-Conviction Procedure Act (UPCPA) application alleging ineffective assistance of counsel. We affirm.

I

FACTS AND PROCEDURE

Short was charged with two counts of grand theft, I.C. §§ 18-2403(1), 18-2407(1). Pursuant to a plea agreement, Short pled guilty to one count of grand theft and the state agreed to dismiss the other. The plea at this time was an I.C.R. 11(d)(1)(B) agreemént and thus was not binding on the district court. Prior to the sentencing hearing, however, Short entered into a written plea agreement with…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Aragon v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1988
  3. State v. O'NEILLIdaho Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Huck v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. State v. RemsburgIdaho Court of Appeals · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Peltier v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API