Legal Opinion

Peltier v. State

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 5, 2003No. 20020232-20020235PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SANDSTROM, Justice.

[¶ 1] Tyrone Peltier appealed from an order denying his motion for post-conviction relief. We conclude Peltier did not receive an illegal sentence when the trial court imposed consecutive sentences upon revocation of probation after Peltier had originally pled guilty under a plea agreement calling for concurrent sentences. We affirm.

I

[¶ 2] On February 19, 1997, Peltier pled guilty to four class C felony charges arising in Ramsey County. The plea was the result of an oral plea agreement between Peltier and the State, which was disclosed in open court. After advising Peltier…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Falcon v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Commonwealth v. AndersonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  3. State v. SaavedraNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  4. United States v. Richard GeraceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  5. DeCoteau v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Greywind v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  2. State v. WardnerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  3. State v. CauserNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  4. State v. HenesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Bay v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API