Legal Opinion
Huck v. State
Idaho Court of Appeals
Decided July 29, 1993No. 20084PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LANSING, Judge.
Robert Huck pled guilty and was convicted in 1989 of felony possession of a Schedule II controlled substance with intent to deliver in violation of Idaho Code § 37-2732(a)(1)(A). He later filed an application for post-conviction relief pursuant to I.C. § 19-4901 on grounds that his guilty plea was the product of ineffective assistance of counsel and coercion. The district court dismissed the application for post-conviction, and Huck appeals from that dismissal. We affirm.
On September 4, 1989, Huck was observed and tape-recorded while selling methamphetamine to a police…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Aragon v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. BearshieldIdaho Supreme Court · 1983
- Russell v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 1990
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Roman v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 1994
- Hassett v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 1995
- State v. HairstonIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. WoodIdaho Supreme Court · 1998
- Dunlap v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 1995
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.