State v. Remsburg
Idaho Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
In this case we address what it means to “closely” observe a subject for fifteen minutes prior to administering the Intoximeter 3000 breath test. Our conclusion upholds the district court’s reversal, on an intermediate appeal, of a magistrate’s order suppressing the use of the test results in a criminal prosecution for driving while under the influence.
I
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
On March 1, 1992, Patrol Officer Phillip Campbell of the Lewiston Police Department stopped an automobile for expired license-plate registration. While speaking with the driver of the vehicle, Dawn Remsburg,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State v. O'NEILLIdaho Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. EmoryIdaho Court of Appeals · 1991
- Tipton v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1989
- Glasmann v. State, Department of Revenue, Motor Vehicle DivisionColorado Court of Appeals · 1986
- State v. SmithConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- State v. GardnerNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1998
- State v. CarsonIdaho Court of Appeals · 1999
- Bennett v. State, Department of TransportationIdaho Court of Appeals · 2009
- State v. DeFrancoIdaho Court of Appeals · 2006
- Patricia S. Reed, Comm., W. Va. DMV v. Jeffrey HillWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2015
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.