Legal Opinion

State v. Remsburg

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided October 6, 1994No. 20874PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Per curiam

In this case we address what it means to “closely” observe a subject for fifteen minutes prior to administering the Intoximeter 3000 breath test. Our conclusion upholds the district court’s reversal, on an intermediate appeal, of a magistrate’s order suppressing the use of the test results in a criminal prosecution for driving while under the influence.

I

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

On March 1, 1992, Patrol Officer Phillip Campbell of the Lewiston Police Department stopped an automobile for expired license-plate registration. While speaking with the driver of the vehicle, Dawn Remsburg,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State v. O'NEILLIdaho Supreme Court · 1990
  2. State v. EmoryIdaho Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. Tipton v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1989
  4. Glasmann v. State, Department of Revenue, Motor Vehicle DivisionColorado Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. State v. SmithConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State v. GardnerNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. State v. CarsonIdaho Court of Appeals · 1999
  3. Bennett v. State, Department of TransportationIdaho Court of Appeals · 2009
  4. State v. DeFrancoIdaho Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. Patricia S. Reed, Comm., W. Va. DMV v. Jeffrey HillWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2015

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API