Legal Opinion

Hodges v. Bales

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 17, 1885No. 11,777PublishedCited by 24 opinions

From the Morgan Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, C. J.

This action was brought by Mary M. Bales against the appellant to recover damages for her seduction.

The complaint was originally in four paragraphs. Pending the action an additional paragraph was filed.

Separate demurrers were filed to the first, second, third and fourth paragraphs. The demurrer was sustained to the third and overruled to the first, second and fourth, and the overruling of the demurrer to these paragraphs is the first error assigned.

The objections which counsel make to the first paragraph are, “ that the means therein alleged are not sufficient to constitute seduction, nor is…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Coffin v. AndersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1837
  2. Brookbank v. State ex rel. MurphyIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  3. Bell v. RinkerIndiana Supreme Court · 1868
  4. Rees v. CuppIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  5. Hart v. WalkerIndiana Supreme Court · 1881

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. FrawleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Boyle v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  3. French v. DeaneSupreme Court of Colorado · 1894
  4. Gunder v. TibbitsIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Hobbs v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1893

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API