Legal Opinion

Hotel Dempsey Company v. Miller

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 10, 1950No. 32739PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTownsend, J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) Ground 1 of the amended motion for a new trial contends that the following charge of the court was error: “I charge you that where an event is unusual and extraordinary in its nature, and you find there is nothing to indicate an independent efficient cause, but the peculiar character of the evejit is sufficient within itself to indicate that it must have been brought about by negli- . gence upon the part of someone, and where the most reasonable and probable inference that can be rationally drawn from the happening of such an event is that it would not and…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Atlanta Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. DannemanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1920
  2. Macon Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. CraneCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937
  3. Western & Atlantic Railroad v. BurnettCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1949
  4. Atlanta Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. ShippCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930
  5. Hilton & Dodge Lumber Co. v. IngramSupreme Court of Georgia · 1911

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. McCluskey v. American Oil Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1969
  2. MacOn Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. ChanceySupreme Court of Georgia · 1960
  3. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'n v. HickmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959
  4. Tifton Brick & Block Co. v. MeadowCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1955
  5. Howard v. RenfroeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1955

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API