Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'n v. Hickman
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Quillian, Judge.
The only general grounds of the motion for new trial insisted on in this court and the motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict raise the single question as to whether the verdict was supported by some evidence.
The motion for new trial assigns as the reason for the insufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict, that the evidence failed to show that the insured came by his death through purely accidental cause “independently and exclusively” of all other causes. The ground points out the provision of the policy that confines its coverage to death caused solely in…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Anderson v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1899
- Bryant v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
- Atlantic & Birmingham Railway Co. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
- Central Manufacturers Mutual Insurance v. GrahamCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1919
- Jackson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1948
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Pembrook Management, Inc. v. CossaboonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
- Altamaha Convalescent Center, Inc. v. GodwinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
- Department of Transportation v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
- Fulghum Industries, Inc. v. Pollard Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
- Gordon v. GordonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.