Atlanta Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. Danneman
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Action for damages; from city court of Atlanta — Judge Eeid. June 14, 1919.
1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.
1. An accident may arise from a mere casualty for which no one is to blame, or it may be brought about by the acts or conduct of persons other than the defendant charged with the duty of providing or maintaining the instrumentality causing the injury, or it may be occasioned by reason of the conduct of the defendant himself, or by the joint action of the plaintiff and defendant. Whenever the allegations of the petition, or the facts shown in support thereof, are such as might reasonably support the inference that the ' accident might have been thus occasioned, no presumption can arise that…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Chenall v. Palmer Brick Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Payne v. Rome Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1912
- Palmer Brick Co. v. ChenallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Augusta Railway & Electric Co. v. WeeklySupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. BlackmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1910
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- MacRes v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1939
- Macon Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. CraneCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937
- MacOn Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. ChanceySupreme Court of Georgia · 1960
- Arnall Mills v. SmallwoodCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1933
- Armour & Co. v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1929
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.