Legal Opinion

Tifton Brick & Block Co. v. Meadow

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 29, 1955No. 35688PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtQuillian, J.

The verdict was not without evidence to support it.

1. Ground 4 of the amended motion complains that, over the objection that the witness was not expert, and his testimony was irrelevant to the issues of the case, a patrolman was permitted to testify that he examined the truck at the scene of the collision, that one of its dual tires on the rear was flat, and that he did not think it was safe to operate.

An expert witness is one who through education, training, or experience has peculiar knowledge concerning some matter of science or skill to which his testimony relates. Code § 38-1710; Doster…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Doster v. BrownSupreme Court of Georgia · 1858
  2. Western & Atlantic Railroad v. BurnettCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1949
  3. White v. ClementsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1869
  4. Western & Atlantic Railroad v. SellersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1914
  5. Beavers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Dimambro Northend Associates v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
  2. Turner v. Baggett Transportation Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
  3. The KROGER COMPANY v. PerpallCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
  4. Rose v. Figgie International, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  5. Allison v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API