Hilton & Dodge Lumber Co. v. Ingram
Supreme Court of Georgia
Action fox damages. Befoxe Judge Paxkex. Glynn supexiox couxt. Octobex 23, 1909.
1Opinion of the CourtEvans, P. J.
This case comes to us fox the fourth time. 108 Ga. 194 (33 S. E. 961); 119 Ga. 652 (46 S. E. 895, 100 A. S. R. 204); 125 Ga. 658 (54 S. E. 648). The paxties have waged legal combat fox sevexal j’ears with vaxying success. We have caxefully considexed the voluminous recoxd, and have xeached the conclusion, that the final chapter should be written. The'suit is by a servant *697against his master to recover damages for an injury sustained while ■engaged in the master’s business. The master operated a sawmill. One department of the business was the trucking of lumber from the mill to the lumber-yard…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Southern Cotton Oil Co. v. SkipperSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
- Southern Railway Co. v. BrockSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
- Ingram v. Hilton & Dodge Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1899
- Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1878
- Hill v. CallahanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1889
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Atlanta Coach Co. v. CobbSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
- Sarman v. Seaboard Air-Line Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
- Felker v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
- Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1912
- Hotel Dempsey Company v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1950
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.