Legal Opinion
George v. Carusone
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided March 24, 1994No. Civ. 3-90-156 (WWE), 3-91-772 (WWE)PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
EGINTON, Senior District Judge.
Plaintiffs Anthony DellaRocco, Bret Houghwout, Bruce Houghwout, Nancy Houghwout, and Charles Watts 1 brought this action against defendants John Ambro-gio, John L. Carusone, David E. Dixon, the Hamden Police Commission, and the Town of Hamden alleging violations of Title III of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968, 18 U.S.C. § 2510-2520 (“Title III”), 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and several state law theories of - liability. The court consolidated the case with a separate action brought by plaintiff Charles…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Charles Amati v. City of WoodstockCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
- United States v. LewisCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
- Flagg ex rel. Bond v. City of DetroitDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2008
- United States v. LanoueCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
- In Re State Police LitigationDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1995
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.