Legal Opinion
In Re State Police Litigation
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided May 16, 1995No. Civ. B-89-606 (TFGD)PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON PENDING MOTIONS
DALY, District Judge.
This case arose after the Connecticut State Police began a policy of automatically recording all calls made into and out of each State Police barracks in the State. The policy first received public attention in November 1989, leading to the filing of the several lawsuits consolidated in this action. The Court has certified a plaintiff class, composed of all persons who unknowingly made recorded calls into or out of State Police facilities between January 1, 1978 and November 9, 1989, as well as a subclass composed of current and former State…
2Cases cited163 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
158 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- In Re State Police LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- Berry, Steven K. v. Funk, Sherman M.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
- Lloyd v. LeeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2008
- DeLeon v. LittleDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1997
- Lonegan v. HastyDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2006
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.