Yuba River Power Co. v. Nevada Irrigation District
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtPreston, J.
This case arises under the Water Commission Act (Stats. 1913, p. 1012) now being administered by the department of public works, division of water sights. To the issue made by the complaint a demurrer was interposed and sustained without leave to amend,. followed by judgment for defendants." Three- propositions are to be taken as true in disposing of the question in controversy; first, that appellant has fully complied with each and every provision of the above-mentioned act entitling it to receive .preferential right to appropriate certain amounts of water from the Yuba River; second, that…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Tulare Water Co. v. State Water CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Wells v. MantesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Department of Public Works v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Mojave River Irrigation District v. Superior Court of San Bernardino CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- People v. EddyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Laisne v. California State Board of OptometryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- G.S. Rasmussen & Associates, Inc. v. Kalitta Flying Service, Inc. Connie Kalitta Services, Inc. Conrad A. KalittaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Silver Hills Country Club v. SobieskiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Lothar Motschenbacher v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, a Corporation, and William Esty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
- Rank v. (Krug) United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1956
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.