Legal Opinion

Townsend v. Milaca Motor Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 3, 1935No. Nos. 30,358, 30,359PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Julius J. Olson, Justice.

Two appeals are involved. In the first the appealing defendants are Milaca Motor Company, The Agency, Hagman Hardware Company, and S. S. Petterson; in the second, O. J. and Edwin Odegard. The two groups separately appeal and are represented by different counsel, but the appeals have been submitted and argued together. Both appeals are from orders of the trial court overruling the separate demurrers interposed. The trial court in each order certified that the questions presented are important and doubtful. The demurrer interposed by the first group is based upon “the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Waughop v. BartlettIllinois Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Clay v. Selah Valley Irrigation Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Seibert v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
  4. Manor Coal Co. v. BeckmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1926
  5. Midland National Bank v. Security Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Parten v. First National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
  2. Veranth v. MoravitzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
  3. United States v. Donaldson Realty Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API