Seibert v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Ry. Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by intervener, F. H. Griggs, from an order of the District Court of Hennepin County, Lochren, J., made August 8, 1892, sustaining the demurrers of the defendants, the Central Trust Company of New York, the Fidelity Insurance Trust & Safe-Deposit Company and the Farmers’ Loan & Trust Company, to his complaint in intervention.
Read the full summary
Appeal by intervener, F. H. Griggs, from an order of the District Court of Hennepin County, Lochren, J., made August 8, 1892, sustaining the demurrers of the defendants, the Central Trust Company of New York, the Fidelity Insurance Trust & Safe-Deposit Company and the Farmers’ Loan & Trust Company, to his complaint in intervention. The Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Company mortgaged its railroad to the Central Trust Company of New York as trustee to secure the payment of certain bonds issued by it. The plaintiff, Henry Seibert, was afterwards substituted as trustee in its place. He brought…
1Opinion of the CourtVanderburgh, J.
This suit is brought to foreclose a certain mortgage executed' by defendant railway company to the Central Trust Company, which Trust Company has been superseded by the appointment of the plaintiff, Henry Seibert, as trustee in its place. The defendants Farmers’ Loan & Trust Company and Central Trust Company are named as trustees in other mortgages executed by the railway company.
The intervener, F. H. Griggs, is the owner of bonds secured by the mortgages executed to the last-named trustees in trust to secure the bondholders holding bonds issued thereunder. In the first three paragraphs, of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Chicago & Vincennes Railroad v. FosdickSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Shaw v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Gasser v. Sun Fire OfficeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
- Gates v. Boston & New York Air Line RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1885
- Howell v. Western Railroad CompanySupreme Court of the United States · 1877
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Monticello Building Corp. v. Monticello Investment Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1932
- Muren v. Southern Coal & Mining Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1913
- Clay v. Selah Valley Irrigation Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1896
- Grant v. Winona & Southwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
- Jones v. Atlantic & Western RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.