Legal Opinion

Midland National Bank v. Security Elevator Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 21, 1924No. 24,036PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

Action on a guaranty of indebtedness of defendant Security Elevator Company to plaintiff. Defendant Kipp alone appeals from .an order denying his motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a new 'trial, after the direction of a verdict for plaintiff for the full amount claimed.

The indebtedness for which recovery is sought is evidenced by two notes of the elevator company to plaintiff, one of December 22, 1921, for $25,000, another of December 27, 1921, for $25,000. Only small payments have been made so that defendant (appellant Kipp will be so referred to), is liable, if at all, for…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Davis v. WellsSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  2. Davis Sewing MacHine Co. v. RichardsSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  3. Adams, Cunningham & Co. v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1838
  4. Bishop v. EatonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1894
  5. Hantzch v. MassoltSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Milliken and Co. v. Eagle Packaging Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  2. Southdale Center, Inc. v. LewisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
  3. State Bank of Cologne v. SchruppCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  4. Borg Warner Acceptance Corp. v. Shakopee Sports Center, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  5. Healy-Owen-Hartzell Co. v. Montevideo Farmers & Merchants Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1925

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API