Legal Opinion

Veranth v. Moravitz

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 24, 1939No. 31,940PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Peterson, Justice.

Appellant applied for leave to intervene as a “vendee-defendant” in a proceeding under 3 Mason Minn. St. 1938 Supp. § 9576-2, brought by plaintiff to terminate a contract for deed between herself as vendor and appellant’s wife as vendee. He owned a building in Ely worth between $10,000 and $18,000 which was his homestead and in which he and his wife operated a hotel. They gave a mortgage on the property to a bank in the sum of $6,000. Plaintiff became the owner of the mortgage by assignment, foreclosed it, and purchased the property at the mortgage foreclosure sale.…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Chandler & Price Co. v. Brandtjen & Kluge, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Coffey v. GreenfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Williams v. StewartSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1879
  4. Oertel v. PierceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
  5. Walker v. SandersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Uselman v. UselmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  2. Matter of Trust Created by HillCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
  3. State Ex Rel. Peterson v. BentleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
  4. Dale Ex Rel. Smith v. PushorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
  5. Phillips v. BrandtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API