Legal Opinion

Robbins v. Walgreens & Broadspire Services, Inc.

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided August 24, 2007No. 4291PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BEATTY, J.:

In this workers’ compensation case, Bryan Robbins appeals from the circuit court’s order affirming the Appellate Panel of the Workers’ Compensation Commission’s denial of his claim for additional compensation based on a change of condition, arguing: (1) he sustained a change of condition within the meaning of the act; and (2) he is entitled to additional medical benefits, including surgery, even if he did not sustain a change of condition because the treatment would tend to lessen his period of disability. We affirm. 1

FACTS

Robbins was the assistant manager at a Walgreens pharmacy…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Lark v. Bi-Lo, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
  2. Shealy v. Aiken CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  3. Grant v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
  4. Rodney v. Michelin Tire Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
  5. Broughton v. South of the BorderCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1999

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Mungo v. Rental Uniform Service of Florence, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2009
  2. Russell v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2016
  3. Frampton v. SCDNRCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2020
  4. Frampton v. SCDNRCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2020
  5. Frampton v. SCDNRCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API