Russell v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

REVERSED AND REMANDED

SHORT, J.

In this workers’ compensation action against Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and American Home Assurance (Wal-Mart), Paula Russell appeals, arguing the South Carolina Workers’ Com*397pensation Commission erred in (1) requiring a change of condition to be established by objective evidence; (2) ruling substantial evidence existed to deny a change of condition; and (3) finding Russell’s statements were self-serving and conclusory. We reverse and remand.

BACKGROUND FACTS

In 2009, Russell was employed by Wal-Mart as an assistant store manager and had been an employee for more than…