Rodney v. Michelin Tire Corp.
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Toal, Justice:
Linda Rodney appeals the circuit court’s order affirming the workers’ compensation commission’s denial of her claim. Michelin Tire and Hartford Accident and Indemnity (collectively “Employer” hereinafter) also appeal alleging error in an evidentiary order by the circuit court.
FACTUAL/PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Rodney was a substitute worker at Michelin Tire. She was trained for ten different jobs, substituting for other workers as needed. Rodney claims that she developed carpal tunnel syndrome while working at one of the jobs, the carcass verification post. This job required her to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bickley Ex Rel. Estate of Bickley v. South Carolina Electric & Gas Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1972
- Owings v. Anderson County Sheriff's DepartmentSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
- Grayson v. Carter Rhoad FurnitureSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
- Gibson v. Florence Country ClubSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1984
- Kearse v. State Health & Human Services Finance CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Tiller v. National Health Care CenterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
- Etheredge v. Monsanto Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2002
- Sea Pines Ass'n for the Protection of Wildlife, Inc. v. South Carolina Department of Natural ResourcesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
- Anderson v. Baptist Medical CenterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
- Gray v. Club Group, Ltd.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2000
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.