Legal Opinion
Youngblood v. Boake
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided December 14, 1926No. 17442PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
PINIvHAM, 0.
The defendant in error, as plaintiff, instituted this action against the plaintiff in error, as defendant, in the district court of Oaddo county. The parties will be referred to as they appeared in the trial court.
The plaintiff alleges in his petition that he is the duly appointed, qualified, and acting administrator of the estate of J. M. Youngblood, deceased; that on July 8, 1925, and for a long time prior thereto', the deceased, J. M. Youngblood, was engaged in business in Anadarko, Okla., where he owned and conducted a music store under the name of J. M. Youngblood…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Cobb v. MartinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Bass Harbour Furniture and Carpet Co. v. HarbourSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Fifth Ave. Library Society v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Moning Dry Goods Co. v. WisemanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Spaulding v. HowardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bass, Maxwell & Co. v. Independent Gin Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- Tradesmens Nat. Bank v. HarrisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
- Chapman v. CarrollSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- Opinion No. 69-107 (1969) Ag, Oklahoma Attorney General Reports1969