Legal Opinion
Bass, Maxwell & Co. v. Independent Gin Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided November 5, 1929No. 18930PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DIEEENDAEEER, C.
Defendant in error was plaintiff, and plaintiff in error was defendant in the trial court. They will be herein referred to as in the trial court.
Plaintiff commenced this action in the district court to recover for an alleged breach of contract for the purchase of certain cotton. Its claim is based upon three separate oral contracts.
The first contract is alleged to have been by telephone, on or about October 23, 1924, wherein it is alleged that plaintiff sold to defendant, and defendant bought from plaintiff, 25 bales of cotton, located at Jones, Okla., at a price of $22.62%…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Garfield v. ParisSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Yoast v. SimsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
- Swafford v. SprattMissouri Court of Appeals · 1902
- Kelley v. McKaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- Youngblood v. BoakeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Beatrice Creamery Co. v. GoldmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Galemore v. Mid-West National Fire & Casualty Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1969
- Hankins v. HallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- Bratten v. WhiteSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- Insurance Co. of North America v. AlexanderDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1970
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.