Legal Opinion

Chapman v. Carroll

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 25, 1928No. 18361PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRiley, J.

Fred A. Chapman, plaintiff below, brought suit against O. G. Carroll, Harry Davidson, and C. H. Purdy, to recover the sum of $5,000 damages, under the terms of a bond executed by Carroll, as principal, and Davidson and Purdy, as sureties, as security for the performance of the terms and .conditions of a drilling contract.

Carroll filed a plea in abatement, based upon his bankruptcy, which was sustained. The cause was tried to a jury. The judgment based upon the verdict of the jury was for defendants Davidson and Purdy, from which Chapman appeals.

There is just one question in this controversy,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mandler v. HarveySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  2. Youngblood v. BoakeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Oklahoma Union Insurance Co. v. MorganSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  2. Rittenhouse v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  3. National Aid Life Ass'n v. MorganSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API