Legal Opinion

Earth Movers of Fairbanks, Inc. v. Fairbanks North Star Borough

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided December 17, 1993No. S-5186PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MATTHEWS, Justice.

The Fairbanks North Star Borough Department of Community Planning (Department) determined that Richard Wagner possessed grandfather rights to extract gravel from a pit he owned in the Borough. In this case, Earth Movers of Fairbanks, Inc., (Earth Movers) appeals the superior court’s holding that Earth Movers did not have standing to challenge that determination.

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

The property at issue is located a few miles north of Fairbanks, off Farmers Loop Road. The property was used from 1962 to 1965 as a source of gravel for construction of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Flast v. CohenSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Sun-Brite Car Wash, Inc. v. Board of Zoning & AppealsNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. Tesoro Alaska Petroleum Co. v. Kenai Pipe Line Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Moore v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Circle Lounge & Grille, Inc. v. Board of AppealMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Balough v. Fairbanks North Star BoroughAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Baxley v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1998
  3. ATC South, Inc. v. Charleston CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2008
  4. Griswold v. City of HomerAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
  5. 1900 Highway 190, L.L.C. v. City of SlidellLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2016

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API