Legal Opinion
ATC South, Inc. v. Charleston County
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided November 17, 2008No. 26563PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Justice KITTREDGE:
This challenge to the rezoning of property in Charleston County, South Carolina, is foreclosed by Appellant’s lack of standing.
South Carolina Electric and Gas Company (SCE&G) owns a seven-acre tract of land on Edisto Island in Charleston County. SCANA Communications, Inc. (SCI) and SCE&G are affiliated corporations. SCI is in the business of constructing communications towers (cell-phone towers) to lease to wireless telecommunications companies. SCE&G leased a portion of its Edisto Island tract to SCI for the purpose of constructing a cell-phone tower. Because the then…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. CunoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Massachusetts v. MellonSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Baird v. Charleston CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
- City of Eureka v. LitzMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Bodman v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2013
- Carnival Corp. v. Historic Ansonborough Neighborhood Ass'nSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2014
- Youngblood v. South Carolina Department of Social ServicesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2013
- South Carolina Public Interest Foundation v. South Carolina Transportation Infrastructure BankSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2013
- Freemantle v. PrestonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2012
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.