Legal Opinion
Radford v. Crown City Lumber & Mill Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 10, 1958No. Civ. 23249PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFourt, J.
The plaintiff in this case filed an action for damages against the defendant. The cause proceeded to trial before a jury. On December 17, 1957, a judgment on verdict in open court was rendered in favor of the defendant and against the plaintiff. The judgment was entered on December 18, 1957. On December 19, 1957, a notice of entry of judgment was signed by one of the attorneys for the defendant, who had his office in Los Angeles, California, and the same was mailed to the attorney for the plaintiff, who had his offices in Long Beach, California. The notice of entry of judgment, with the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Prothero v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Fong Chuck v. Chin Po FoonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Neale v. MorrowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Kientz v. HarrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- King v. WilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Seeley v. SeymourCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- State v. ZitoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1969
- Douglas v. JanisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- In Re Marriage of PatscheckCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Garcia v. LucidoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.