Legal Opinion

Kientz v. Harris

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 15, 1953No. Civ. 8418PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVan Dyke, P. J.

Victor Vincent Kientz, as plaintiff in the trial court, filed an action against Arthur 0 ’Dell Harris, wherein he sought damages for the alleged wrongful death of Ruth Evelyn Kientz. On November 17, 1952, a judgment was entered in the action that plaintiff recover the sum of $25,000. Notice of entry of judgment was, after service, filed on November 22, 1952. It was received by counsel for the appellant on November 22d. Notice of intention to move for a new trial was filed on behalf of defendant, appellant here. It was stamped as having been filed December 5th. It had actually been received at…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Estate of Hanley v. HanleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Tregambo v. Comanche Mill & Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Cox v. Tyrone Power Enterprises Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1942
  4. Dempsey v. Market Street Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Boyd v. BurrelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Life v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  2. Harvey v. City of HoltvilleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  3. Foley v. FoleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  4. Duran v. St. Luke's HospitalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  5. Fritz v. FooteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API