Legal Opinion
Application of Louise H. Brown and Ronald Swidler
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided July 24, 1969No. Patent Appeal 8075PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
On Petition For Rehearing
2Per curiam
By order of the court, appellants’ petition for rehearing is granted only to the extent of changing the language of the original opinion dated February 20, 1969, 406 F.2d 780, 56 CCPA -, as follows:
In line two of page 3 of the opinion, change “olefin” to “olefinic acid.”
Delete the first eleven lines of the text on page 5 of the opinion, and insert therefor:
“examiner and the board deprives us of the benefit of their views on that particular issue and we do not consider it. In re Fong, 54 CCPA 1482, 378 F.2d 977, 154 USPQ 25; In re Moureau, 52 CCPA 1363, 345 F.2d 595,…
3Cases cited3 opinions
- Application of Willie Fong, Amon H. Brown, William L. Wasley, Robert E. Whitfield and Lowell A. MillerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1967
- Application of Henri Moureu and Paul ChovinCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965
- Application of Louise H. Brown and Ronald SwidlerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1969
4Cited by2 opinions
- In re LangeCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1981
- In re MichelCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972