Legal Opinion

Application of Louise H. Brown and Ronald Swidler

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided July 24, 1969No. Patent Appeal 8075PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

On Petition For Rehearing

2Per curiam

By order of the court, appellants’ petition for rehearing is granted only to the extent of changing the language of the original opinion dated February 20, 1969, 406 F.2d 780, 56 CCPA -, as follows:

In line two of page 3 of the opinion, change “olefin” to “olefinic acid.”

Delete the first eleven lines of the text on page 5 of the opinion, and insert therefor:

“examiner and the board deprives us of the benefit of their views on that particular issue and we do not consider it. In re Fong, 54 CCPA 1482, 378 F.2d 977, 154 USPQ 25; In re Moureau, 52 CCPA 1363, 345 F.2d 595,…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Application of Willie Fong, Amon H. Brown, William L. Wasley, Robert E. Whitfield and Lowell A. MillerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1967
  2. Application of Henri Moureu and Paul ChovinCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965
  3. Application of Louise H. Brown and Ronald SwidlerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1969

4Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re LangeCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1981
  2. In re MichelCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API