In the Interest of R.A.L., a Child
Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Opinion by
Justice MOSELEY.
After a trial to a jury, the parental rights between John and Mary and their biological son, Absalom, 1 were terminated. The termination action was not instituted by any State agency but, rather, by Mrs. Smith (Mary’s mother) and her husband, Mr. Smith (Mary’s stepfather), as a predicate to an action for adoption. John and Mary each appeal from this order, alleging that the evidence was legally and factually insufficient to support termination and that they received ineffective assistance of counsel in this private termination suit. They further urge that the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- In the interest of C.H.Texas Supreme Court · 2002
- In the Interest of J.F.C.Texas Supreme Court · 2002
- Golden Eagle Archery, Inc. v. JacksonTexas Supreme Court · 2003
- In the Interest of A.V.Texas Supreme Court · 2003
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- in the Interest of Z.M., W.M., and L.M., Children, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2015
- Anthony Brinker and Kelley Brinker v. Jimmy Evans Company, Ltd., Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2012
- In the Interest of R.N., R.N., R.N., Children, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2011
- In the Interest of J.K.V.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2016
- $1,608.00 in U.S. Currency and 2008 Mazda, VIN 1YVHP80C385M37457 v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2015
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.