Legal Opinion

In the Interest of R.N., R.N., R.N., Children

Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)

Decided December 9, 2011No. 06-11-00079-CVPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion by

Justice MOSELEY.

Parents, Roy and Kimberly Neyens, appeal the termination of their parental rights to their three children, an action sought by the Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Child Protective Services Division (CPS). Although the Neyenses make no challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence supporting the grounds for termination or finding concerning the best interests of the children, they complain of the trial court’s exclusion of certain evidence and its refusal to declare a mistrial. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

I. Trial Court Did Not…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Holley v. AdamsTexas Supreme Court · 1976
  2. City of Brownsville v. AlvaradoTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Beaumont Bank, N.A. v. BullerTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Bay Area Healthcare Group, Ltd. v. McShaneTexas Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Mercedes-Benz Credit Corp. v. RhyneTexas Supreme Court · 1996

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Great Northern Energy, Inc. v. Circle Ridge Production, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2017
  2. Cesar De Los Reyes v. Norma Leticia Maris J&K Truck Sales, LLC And Jose Fernandez, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2021
  3. City of Lufkin, Texas, a Municipal Corporation v. AKJ Properties, Inc., Rollin J Transportation, Inc., and Alton Kirk Johnson, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2012
  4. in the Interest of A.P., K.P., and E.P., Children, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API