Legal Opinion
Henry Edsel Holmes v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided July 12, 1989No. 88-8555PublishedCited by 138 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MORGAN, Senior Circuit Judge:
Henry Edsel Holmes was convicted of engaging in a continuing criminal enterprise (“CCE”) in violation of 21 U.S.C. Sec. 848, and filing of a false income tax return, in violation of 26 U.S.C. Sec. 7206(1), after pleading guilty to these offenses. In this appeal, Holmes complains that the trial court failed to inform him of the mandatory minimum sentence and the unavailability of parole under the CCE statute, contrary to the letter of Rule 11, Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, and contends that he was denied effective assistance of counsel because his attorney…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. TimmreckSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Warden v. MarreroSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- David Wayne Baker v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by138 opinions
- Anthony Aron v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Henry Affit Lejarde-RadaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
- Wilson Daniel Winthrop-Redin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2014
- Gerald Eugene Stano, Cross-Appellee v. Richard L. Dugger, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
- Michael A. Rosin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2015
133 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.