Legal Opinion
Gerald Eugene Stano, Cross-Appellee v. Richard L. Dugger, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, Cross-Appellant
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided January 2, 1991No. 88-3375PublishedCited by 189 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FAY, Circuit Judge:
Gerald Eugene Stano appealed from the district court’s denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Although Stano raised numerous claims on appeal, this court granted relief, subsequently vacated, under the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution. Stano v. Dugger, 889 F.2d 962 (11th Cir.1989), vacated, 897 F.2d 1067 (11th Cir.1990) (per curiam). After rehearing en banc and thoroughly reviewing the two issues presented of self-representation and ineffective assistance of counsel, the en banc court concludes that…
2Cases cited96 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
91 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by189 opinions
- United States v. Sean Lamont CromerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Brent Paul SwansonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Daniel Eugene Frazer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Omar Blanco, Cross-Appellant v. Harry K. Singletary, as Secretary, Department of Corrections, State of Florida, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Larry Roscoe McGlocklinCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
184 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.