Legal Opinion

Rosenthal v. Hartnett

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 24, 1975PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJones, J.

The real question on this appeal is whether the Legislature may constitutionally authorize administrative rather than judicial adjudication of traffic infractions and as an incident thereto establish “ clear and convincing evidence ” as the required quantum of proof for a determination of guilt where such determination may result in the imposition of a fine but not imprisonment. We conclude that it may do so.

By chapter 1074 of the Laws of 1969 the Legislature enacted article 2-A of the Vehicle and Traffic Law, authorizing administrative adjudication of traffic infractions in cities of over…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Baldwin v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Missouri v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  3. Salsburg v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  4. London Sporting Club, Inc. v. HelfandNew York Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Rosenthal v. HartnettNew York Supreme Court · 1972

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. People v. DavisNew York Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. McHugh v. Santa Monica Rent Control BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Weissman v. EvansNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. Evans v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API