Legal Opinion

Salsburg v. Maryland

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 18, 1954No. 38PublishedCited by 262 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burton

The ultimate issue here is whether Maryland has violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment by authorizing its courts, in prosecutions in Anne Arundel County for certain gambling misdemeanors, to admit evidence procured by illegal search or seizure. The violation is charged because Maryland, at the same time, prohibits the admission of such evidence in like prosecutions in other counties, and, even in Anne Arundel County, prohibits its admission in prosecutions for many other misdemeanors. For the reasons hereafter stated, we hold that Maryland’s action is valid.

In 1952,…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Weeks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  3. Wolf v. ColoradoSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  4. Hayes v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  5. Adams v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1904

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by262 opinions

  1. San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. South Carolina v. KatzenbachSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Goldblatt v. Town of HempsteadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Baldwin v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1970

257 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API