Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Hitchcock

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 23, 2000PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOYCE, J.:

¶ I This is a pro se appeal from the order of the trial court which denied the petition for permission to appeal nunc pro tunc filed by Appellant, Ronale Hitchcock. For the reasons set forth below, we reverse and remand for further proceedings. Before addressing the merits of Appellant’s claims, we will recount the relevant facts giving rise to this appeal.

¶ 2 During the early morning hours of October 29, 1996, Appellant entered a bar in the City of Harrisburg and began firing a .45 caliber semi-automatic weapon at four of the patrons. The barmaid, Nikia Wallace, recognized…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Commonwealth v. McClendonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. Commonwealth v. LantzySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  4. Commonwealth v. PeterkinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  5. Commonwealth v. CabezaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. JordanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  2. Commonwealth v. FairirorSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  3. Commonwealth v. EllerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  4. Commonwealth v. HernandezSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  5. Commonwealth v. GarciaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API